EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case F-111/11: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 21 March 2013 — van der Aat and Others v Commission (Civil service — Remuneration — Annual adjustment of the remuneration and pensions of officials and other servants — Articles 64, 65, and 65a of the Staff Regulations — Annex XI to the Staff Regulations — Regulation (EU) No 1239/2010 — Correction coefficients — Officials employed at Ispra)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62011FA0111

62011FA0111

March 21, 2013
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

25.5.2013

Official Journal of the European Union

C 147/32

(Case F-111/11) (<span class="super">1</span>)

(Civil service - Remuneration - Annual adjustment of the remuneration and pensions of officials and other servants - Articles 64, 65, and 65a of the Staff Regulations - Annex XI to the Staff Regulations - Regulation (EU) No 1239/2010 - Correction coefficients - Officials employed at Ispra)

2013/C 147/59

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: van der Aat and Others (Besozzo, Italy) (represented by: S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis, É. Marchal, and D. Abreu Caldas, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and D. Martin, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for the annulment of the applicants’ pay slips for the month of February 2011 and the pay slips for the following months applying the new correction coefficient for the town of Varese in accordance with Council Regulation (EU) No 1239/2010 of 20 December 2010.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

1.Dismisses the action;

2.Declares that the applicants must bear their own costs and orders them to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission;

3.Declares that the Council of the European Union, intervener, must bear its own costs.

(<span class="note"> <a id="ntr1-C_2013147EN.01003203-E0001" href="#ntc1-C_2013147EN.01003203-E0001">*1</a> </span>) OJ C 6, 7.1.2012, p.27.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia