- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-132/08: Action brought on 2 April 2008 — ENRI Electronics v OHIM (MaxiBridge)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62008TN0132
62008TN0132
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
7.6.2008
Official Journal of the European Union
C 142/31
(Case T-132/08)
(2008/C 142/56)
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Parties
Applicant: ENRI Electronics GmbH (Adelberg, Germany) (represented by N. Breitenbach, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Form of order sought
—Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 30 January 2008 in Case R 1530/2006-4;
—Order OHIM to pay the costs, including the costs incurred in the course of the appeal.
Pleas in law and main arguments
Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘MaxiBridge’ for goods in Classes 9 and 17 (Application No 4 899 647).
Decision of the Examiner: Application rejected
Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed
Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (1) inasmuch as the mark in respect of which application is sought does not constitute an indication which needs to be kept freely available.
(1) Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark (OJ 1994 L 11, p. 1).