- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-476/19: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 October 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Kammarrätten i Göteborg — Sweden) — Allmänna ombudet hos Tullverket v Combinova AB (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Union Customs Code — Article 124(1)(k) — Extinction of the customs debt in the event the goods are not used — Concept of ‘goods that have been used’ — Inward processing procedure — Customs debt incurred through non-compliance with requirements provided for under the inward processing procedure — Bill of discharge not submitted within the prescribed time limit)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019CA0476
62019CA0476
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
30.11.2020
Official Journal of the European Union
C 414/10
(Case C-476/19) (*)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Union Customs Code - Article 124(1)(k) - Extinction of the customs debt in the event the goods are not used - Concept of ‘goods that have been used’ - Inward processing procedure - Customs debt incurred through non-compliance with requirements provided for under the inward processing procedure - Bill of discharge not submitted within the prescribed time limit)
(2020/C 414/11)
Language of the case: Swedish
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Appellant: Allmänna ombudet hos Tullverket
Opposing party: Combinova AB
Operative part of the judgment
Article 124(1)(k) of Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 October 2013 laying down the Union Customs Code must be interpreted as meaning that the use of the goods referred to in that provision concerns only use which goes beyond the processing operations authorised by the customs authority under the inward processing procedure provided for in Article 256 of that code, and not use in accordance with those authorised processing operations.
(*) Language of the case: Swedish.