EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-590/20: Judgment of the General Court of 18 October 2023 — Clariant and Clariant International v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Ethylene market — Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU — Coordination on a purchase price element — Settlement procedure — Fine — Adjustment of the basic amount of the fine — Point 37 of the Guidelines on the method of setting fines — Repeat infringement — Point 28 of the Guidelines on the method of setting fines — Unlimited jurisdiction — Counterclaim for increase of the amount of the fine)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020TA0590

62020TA0590

October 18, 2023
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

Series C

C/2023/1135

4.12.2023

(Case T-590/20)

(Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Ethylene market - Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU - Coordination on a purchase price element - Settlement procedure - Fine - Adjustment of the basic amount of the fine - Point 37 of the Guidelines on the method of setting fines - Repeat infringement - Point 28 of the Guidelines on the method of setting fines - Unlimited jurisdiction - Counterclaim for increase of the amount of the fine)

(C/2023/1135)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Clariant AG (Muttenz, Switzerland), Clariant International AG (Muttenz) (represented by: F. Montag and M. Dreher, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Boitos, I. Rogalski and J. Szczodrowski, acting as Agents)

Re:

By their action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicants seek, by way of principal claim, the partial annulment of Commission Decision C(2020) 4817 final, of 14 July 2020, relating to a proceeding under Article 101 TFEU (AT.40410 — Ethylene) and, in the alternative, a reduction of the amount of the fine imposed on them ‘jointly and severally’ in that decision. The European Commission seeks, by way of counterclaim, an increase of the amount of that fine.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.Dismisses the action;

2.Dismisses the European Commission’s counterclaim;

3.Orders Clariant AG and Clariant International AG to bear their own costs and to pay 90 % of the costs incurred by the Commission;

4.Orders the Commission to bear 10 % of its own costs.

(1) OJ C 399, 23.11.2020.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/1135/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia