- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case F-118/11: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 25 February 2014 — Marcuccio v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Decision by the appointing authority to retire an official and to grant an invalidity allowance — Decision not addressing the occupational origin of the disease which justified retirement — Obligation on the appointing authority to recognise the occupational origin of the disease — Article 78, fifth paragraph, of the Staff Regulations — Need to convene a new invalidity committee — Relevance of an earlier decision adopted under Article 73 of the Staff Regulations — Article 76 of the Rules of Procedure — Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62011FB0118
62011FB0118
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 102/44
(Case F-118/11) (<span class="super">1</span>)
((Civil service - Officials - Decision by the appointing authority to retire an official and to grant an invalidity allowance - Decision not addressing the occupational origin of the disease which justified retirement - Obligation on the appointing authority to recognise the occupational origin of the disease - Article 78, fifth paragraph, of the Staff Regulations - Need to convene a new invalidity committee - Relevance of an earlier decision adopted under Article 73 of the Staff Regulations - Article 76 of the Rules of Procedure - Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded))
2014/C 102/65
Language of the case: Italian
Parties
Applicant: Luigi Marcuccio (Tricase, Italy) (represented by: G. Cipressa, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Berardis-Kayser and J. Banquero Cruz, Agents, and A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)
Re:
Application for annulment of the Commission’s implied decision refusing to adopt a decision concerning the occupational origin of the disease suffered by the applicant.
Operative part of the order
1.The action is dismissed as being in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.
2.Each party is ordered to bear its own costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 25, 28.1.2012. p. 70