I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
—
(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - Figurative mark representing three Chinese characters - Absolute ground for invalidity - Bad faith - Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
(C/2025/4450)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Guangzhou Wanglaoji Grand Health Co. Ltd (Guangzhou, China) (represented by: P. Groß, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: E. Nicolás Gómez and T. Klee, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Multi Access Ltd (Road Town, British Virgin Islands) (represented by H. Gauß and S. Rak, lawyers)
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 19 December 2023 (Case R 329/2023-4).
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Guangzhou Wanglaoji Grand Health Co. Ltd to pay the costs.
—
(1) OJ C, C/2024/2783, 29.4.2024.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4450/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—