EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-289/16: Order of the General Court of 21 June 2017 — Inox Mare v Commission (Action for annulment — Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 883/2013 — External investigation conducted by OLAF — Report and recommendations — Measures not amenable to challenge — Inadmissible)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62016TB0289

62016TB0289

June 21, 2017
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

14.8.2017

Official Journal of the European Union

C 269/20

(Case T-289/16)(Action for annulment - Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 883/2013 - External investigation conducted by OLAF - Report and recommendations - Measures not amenable to challenge - Inadmissible)

(2017/C 269/29)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Inox Mare Srl (Rimini, Italy) (represented by: R. Holzeisen, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: initially, J. Baquero Cruz, D. Nardi and L. Grønfeldt, and, subsequently, J. Baquero Cruz and D. Nardi, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU, seeking annulment of the Final Report of the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) concerning external investigation OF/2013/0086/B1 (THOR(2015) 40189 of 26 November 2015), of the recommendation of the Director-General of OLAF with respect to that report (THOR(2015) 42057 of 9 December 2015) and of the prior and strictly related measures taken by OLAF

Operative part of the order

1.The action is dismissed as being inadmissible.

2.Inox Mare Srl shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.

* Language of the case: Italian.

(1) OJ C 270, 25.7.2016.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia