- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-652/18: Action brought on 30 October 2018 — Porus v EUIPO (oral Dialysis)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62018TN0652
62018TN0652
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
7.1.2019
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 4/39
(Case T-652/18)
(2019/C 4/52)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Porus GmbH (Monheim am Rhein, Germany) (represented by: C. Weil, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘oral Dialysis’ — Application for registration No 16 774 259
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 14 September 2018 in Case R 1375/2018-2
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—uphold the application;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs.
Pleas in law
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.