I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(2017/C 239/64)
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Applicant: Buck-Chemie GmbH (Herrenberg, Germany) (represented by: C. Schultze, J. Ossing, R.-D. Härer, C. Weber, H. Ranzinger, C. Brockmann and C. Gehweiler, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Henkel AG & Co. KGaA (Düsseldorf, Germany)
Proprietor of the design at issue: other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Design at issue: Community design No 1663618-0003
Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 8 March 2017 in Case R 2113/2015-3
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order the defendant and the other party to pay the costs incurred by the applicant in the proceedings before the Court and before the Board of Appeal.
—Infringement of Article 62 and Article 63 of Regulation No 6/2002;
—Infringement of Article 25(1)(a) and (b) of Regulation No 6/2002;
—Infringement of Article 3(a) of Regulation No 6/2002;
—Infringement of Article 4(1) of Regulation No 6/2002;
—Infringement of Article 5 and Article 6 of Regulation No 6/2002.