5.6.2010

Official Journal of the European Union

C 148/21

(Case C-161/10)

2010/C 148/33

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Olivier Martinez, Robert Martinez

Defendant: MGN Limited

Question referred

Must Articles 2 and 5(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (1) be interpreted to mean that a court or tribunal of a Member State has jurisdiction to hear an action brought in respect of an infringement of personal rights allegedly committed by the placing on-line of information and/or photographs on an internet site published in another Member State by a company domiciled in that second State — or in a third Member State, but in any event a State other than the first Member State —:

—on the sole condition that the internet site can be accessed from the first Member State,

—on the sole condition that there is between the harmful act and the territory of the first Member State a link which is sufficient, substantial or significant and, in that case, whether that link can be created by:

—the number of hits on the page at issue made from the first Member State, as an absolute figure or as a proportion of all hits on that page,

—the residence, or nationality, of the person who complains of the infringement of his or her personal rights or, more generally, of the persons concerned,

—the language in which the information at issue is broadcast or any other factor which may demonstrate the site publisher’s intention to address specifically the public of the first Member State,

—the place where the events described occurred and/or where the photographic-images put on line were taken,

—other criteria?

* Language of the case: English.

(1) OJ 2001 L 12, p. 1.