- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-827/19: Order of the General Court of 30 October 2020 — Gáspár v Commission (Action for annulment — Civil service — Transfer of national pension rights — Complaint brought after the expiry of the three-month period laid down in Article 90(2) of the Staff Regulations — No excusable error — Manifest inadmissibility)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019TB0827
62019TB0827
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
18.1.2021
Official Journal of the European Union
C 19/49
(Case T-827/19) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(Action for annulment - Civil service - Transfer of national pension rights - Complaint brought after the expiry of the three-month period laid down in Article 90(2) of the Staff Regulations - No excusable error - Manifest inadmissibility)
(2021/C 19/52)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Norbert Gáspár (Mensdorf, Luxembourg) (represented by: R. Wardyn, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B. Mongin and M. Brauhoff, acting as Agents)
Re:
Action brought under Article 270 TFEU, seeking annulment of the decision of the Commission’s Office for the Administration and Payment of Individual Entitlements (PMO) of 23 May 2018 confirming the transfer to the pension scheme of the EU institutions of pension rights acquired by the applicant prior to his entry into the service of the European Union.
Operative part of the order
1.The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.
2.Mr Norbert Gáspár shall pay the costs.
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 61, 24.2.2020.