- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-276/25, RÖSLE GROUP: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší soud (Czech Republic) lodged on 11 April 2025 – RÖSLE GROUP GmbH v EVROmat a.s.
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62025CN0276
62025CN0276
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
EN
C series
—
C/2025/3406
30.6.2025
(Case C-276/25, RÖSLE GROUP)
(C/2025/3406)
Language of the case: Czech
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: RÖSLE GROUP GmbH
Defendant: EVROmat a.s.
Question referred
Must the provisions of Article 8(1) and (2) of Directive 2004/48/EC (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the enforcement of intellectual property rights be interpreted as meaning that a national court must, on the application of an applicant, order an infringer (or another person referred to therein) not only to provide the information referred to therein itself, but also impose the obligation to demonstrate the accuracy and completeness of the information by presenting the relevant documents to the applicant?
—
(1)
OJ 2004 L 157, p. 45.
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3406/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—