EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case F-45/10: Action brought on 11 June 2010 — Kaser/Commission

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62010FN0045

62010FN0045

June 11, 2010
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

14.8.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 221/60

(Case F-45/10)

()

2010/C 221/96

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Ferdinand Kaser (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: M. Schober, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

The subject matter and description of the proceedings

First, annulment of the Decision of the European Commission CMS 07/046 removing applicant from his post, without reduction of the pension rights, witch took effect on 15 August 2009 and the annulment of all decisions taken against the applicant in the period between September 2003 until the removing from the post and, second, a claim for damages.

Form of order sought

The applicant claim that the Court should:

Annul the Decision CMS 07/046 due to harassment, mismanagement and the abuse of the fundamental right to be heard;

annul all decisions taken by the Appointing Authority against the applicant between the period September 2003 until the removing from the post due to harassment and mismanagement due to the abuse of the right of the applicant to be heard;

enable a hearing of the applicant according to Article 7(1) and Article 24 of the Staff Regulations, and to refer to the submitted requests in February 2008 and March 2008;

grant a symbolic compensation of one (1) Euro to the applicant in order to compensate his moral and professional prejudice he suffered as exposed in the present complaint, as far as the objective of such a complaint is not money but recognition of dignity and professional reputation of the applicant.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia