- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-6/13 P: Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 7 November 2013 — IDT Biologika GmbH v European Commission (Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Public supply contracts — Call for tenders related to the supply in Serbia of rabies vaccines — Rejection of a tender — Appeal clearly inadmissible or unfounded)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62013CB0006
62013CB0006
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
21.12.2013
Official Journal of the European Union
C 377/4
(Case C-6/13 P) (<span class="super">1</span>)
(Appeal - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Public supply contracts - Call for tenders related to the supply in Serbia of rabies vaccines - Rejection of a tender - Appeal clearly inadmissible or unfounded)
2013/C 377/07
Language of the case: German
Parties
Appellant: IDT Biologika GmbH (represented by: R. Gross and T. Kroupa, Rechtsanwälte)
Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: F. Erlbacher and T. Scharf, acting as Agents)
Re:
Appeal brought against the judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 25 October 2012 in Case T-503/10 IDT Biologika v Commission by which the General Court dismissed an application for annulment of the decision of the Delegation of the European Union to the Republic of Serbia of 10 August 2010 awarding the contract (reference EuropeAid/129809/C/SUP/RS) for the supply of rabies vaccines for vaccination campaigns in Serbia to the consortium led by the company Bioveta a.s. and rejecting the tender submitted by the applicant — Whether the limits to which the Commission is subject in the exercise of its discretion were exceeded
Operative part of the order
1.The appeal is dismissed.
2.IDT Biologika GmbH is ordered to pay the costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 108, 13.4.2013.
Language of the case: German