I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
C series
—
(EU trade mark - Revocation proceedings - EU word mark AMSTERDAM POPPERS - Lack of genuine use of the mark - Article 58(1)(a) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Action for annulment - Representation by a lawyer - Admissibility)
(C/2025/2382)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Funline International Corp. (Wilmington, Delaware, United States) (represented by: S. Hejdová and J. Brauner, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Ringelhann, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: MS Trade s. r. o. (Prague, Czech Republic) (represented by: A. Daňková, lawyer)
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks, in essence, the annulment of the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 19 October 2023 (Case R 2265/2022-5).
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Funline International Corp. to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO);
3.Orders MS Trade s. r. o. to bear its own costs.
—
OJ C C/2024/1428, 19.2.2024.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2382/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—