- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-337/09 P: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 19 July 2012 — Council of the European Union v Zhejiang Xinan Chemical Industrial Group Co. Ltd, European Commission, Association des utilisateurs et distributeurs de l’agrochimie européenne (Audace) (Appeal — Commercial policy — Dumping — Imports of glyphosate originating in China — Regulation (EC) No 384/96 — Article 2(7)(b) and (c) — Status of an undertaking operating under market economy conditions — Concept of ‘significant State interference’ within the meaning of the first indent of Article 2(7)(c) — State shareholder controlling de facto the general meeting of the producer’s shareholders — Equating such control to ‘significant interference’ — Assessment of an export contract stamping mechanism — Limits of judicial review — Assessment of the evidence submitted)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62009CA0337
62009CA0337
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
29.9.2012
Official Journal of the European Union
C 295/2
(Case C-337/09 P) (<span class="super">1</span>)
(Appeal - Commercial policy - Dumping - Imports of glyphosate originating in China - Regulation (EC) No 384/96 - Article 2(7)(b) and (c) - Status of an undertaking operating under market economy conditions - Concept of ‘significant State interference’ within the meaning of the first indent of Article 2(7)(c) - State shareholder controlling de facto the general meeting of the producer’s shareholders - Equating such control to ‘significant interference’ - Assessment of an export contract stamping mechanism - Limits of judicial review - Assessment of the evidence submitted)
2012/C 295/02
Language of the case: English
Parties
Appellant: Council of the European Union (represented by: J.-P. Hix, acting as Agent, and by G. Berrisch, Rechtsanwalt)
Other parties to the proceedings: Zhejiang Xinan Chemical Industrial Group Co. Ltd (represented initially by D. Horovitz, avocat, and subsequently by F. Graafsma, J. Cornelis and A. Woolich, advocaten, K. Adamantopoulos, dikigoros, and D. Moulis, Barrister), European Commission (represented by: T. Scharf, N. Khan and K. Talabér-Ritz, acting as Agents), Association des utilisateurs et distributeurs de l’agrochimie européenne (Audace) (represented by: J. Flynn QC)
Re:
Appeal against the judgment of 17 June 2009 of the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber) in Case T-498/04 Zhejiang Xinan Chemical Industrial Group v Council [2009] ECR II-1969, annulling, in so far as it concerns Zhejiang Xinan Chemical Industrial Group Co. Ltd., Article 1 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1683/2004 of 24 September 2004 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of glyphosate originating in the People’s Republic of China (OJ 2004 L 303, p. 1) — Interpretation of Article 2(7)(c) of Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community (OJ 1996 L 56, p. 1) — Market economy treatment
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the appeal;
2.Orders the Council of the European Union to pay the costs, including those relating to the proceedings for interim relief;
3.Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 282, 21.11.2009.