- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-183/12 P: Appeal brought on 18 April 2012 by Chafiq Ayadi against the order of the General Court (Second Chamber) delivered on 31 January 2012 in Case T-527/09: Chafiq Ayadi v European Commission
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62012CN0183
62012CN0183
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
30.6.2012
Official Journal of the European Union
C 194/12
—
(Case C-183/12 P)
2012/C 194/19
Language of the case: English
Parties
Appellant: Chafiq Ayadi (represented by: H.A.S. Miller, Solicitor)
Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission, Council of the European Union
Form of order sought
The Appellant seeks the following order if successful on both pleas:
—the order of the General Court dated 31 January 2012 is quashed
—it is declared that the action for annulment is not devoid of purpose
—the matter be remitted back to the General Court for it to determine the annulment application
—The Commission do pay the costs of this appeal and the costs of defending the Commission's application to find the annulment action devoid of purpose before the General Court.
Pleas in law and main arguments
The Appellant raises the following two pleas in law:
A.The General Court erred when it failed to:
(a)hear from the Advocate-General and/or
(b)invite representations from the Appellant as to whether the oral procedure ought to be opened and/or
(c)open the oral procedure on the question as to whether the application to annul was devoid of purpose.
B.The General Court erred in finding that the action for annulment was not capable of conferring material advantage upon the Appellant.
—