EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-328/22: Judgment of the General Court of 13 September 2023 — Korres v EUIPO — Naos (EST. KORRES 1996 HYDRA-BIOME) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark EST. KORRES 1996 HYDRA-BIOME — Earlier national word mark HYDRABIO — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Obligation to state reasons — First sentence of Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Scope of the examination to be carried out by the Board of Appeal — First sentence of Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022TA0328

62022TA0328

September 13, 2023
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

Series C

C/2023/531

(Case T-328/22) (*)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU figurative mark EST. KORRES 1996 HYDRA-BIOME - Earlier national word mark HYDRABIO - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Obligation to state reasons - First sentence of Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 - Scope of the examination to be carried out by the Board of Appeal - First sentence of Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001)

(C/2023/531)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Korres AE — Fysika Proionta (Metamorfosi Attikis, Greece) (represented by: S. Tsimikalis, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: T. Frydendahl, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Naos (Aix-en-Provence, France) (represented by L. Janin-Reynaud, lawyer)

Re:

By its action based on Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 23 March 2022 (Case R 1410/2021-5).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.Annuls the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 23 March 2022 (Case R 1410/2021-5);

2.Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Korres AE — Fysika Proionta;

3.Orders Naos to bear its own costs.

(*)

Language of the case: English

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/531/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

* * *

(C/2023/531)

Language of the case: English

ECLI:EU:C:2023:531

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia