I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark AKTIVAMED - Earlier national figurative mark VAMED - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) and (5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
(2015/C 155/28)
Language of the case: German
Applicant: Michael Radecki (Cologne, Germany) (represented by: C. Menebröcker and V. Töbelmann, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: initially A. Pohlmann then S. Hanne, Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Vamed AG (Vienna, Austria) (represented by: R. Paulitsch, lawyer)
Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 18 July 2013 (Case R 365/2012-1) relating to opposition proceedings between Vamed AG and Michael Radecki.
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Mr Michael Radecki to pay the costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 367, 14.12.2013.