- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-602/19: Judgment of the General Court of 5 October 2020 — Eugène Perma France v EUIPO — SPI Investments Group (NATURANOVE) (European Union trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark NATURANOVE — Earlier EU word mark NATURALIUM — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019TA0602
62019TA0602
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 423/37
(Case T-602/19) (*)
(European Union trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU word mark NATURANOVE - Earlier EU word mark NATURALIUM - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(2020/C 423/53)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Eugène Perma France (Saint-Denis, France) (represented by S. Havard Duclos, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by J. Crespo Carrillo and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: SPI Investments Group, SL (Sant Just Desvern, Spain)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 1 July 2019 (Case R 2161/2018-4), concerning opposition proceedings between SPI Investments Group and Eugène Perma France.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 1 July 2019 (Case R 2161/2018-4), relating to opposition proceedings between SPI Investments Group, SL and Eugène Perma France;
2.Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the applicant, including the costs necessarily incurred for the purposes of the appeal proceedings before the Board of Appeal.
(*) Language of the case: English.