I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-10/17) (*)
((Public service contracts - Tender procedure - Request for services that were split into two lots - Website services - Rejection of the tender submitted by a tenderer - Award criteria - Transparency - Equal treatment - Manifest error of assessment - Non-contractual liability))
(2018/C 436/55)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Proof IT SIA (Riga, Latvia) (represented by: J. Jerņeva and D. Pāvila, lawyers)
Defendant: European Institute for Gender Equality (represented by: J. Stuyck, V. Ost and M. Vanderstraeten, lawyers)
Application, first, under Article 263 TFEU for annulment of EIGE’s decision rejecting the tender submitted by the applicant in the context of Lot 1 relating to invitation to tender EIGE/2016/OPER/03 entitled ‘Framework contract for online services’, and awarding the framework contract to another tenderer, and, second, under Article 268 TFEU seeking compensation for the damage allegedly suffered by the applicant on account of loss of opportunity or loss of the contract itself.
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Proof IT SIA to pay the costs.
(*)
Language of the case: English.
ECLI:EU:C:2018:140