EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-131/24: Action brought on 29 February 2024 – CR v Commission

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024TN0131

62024TN0131

February 29, 2024
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

EN

C series

C/2024/2640

22.4.2024

(Case T-131/24)

(C/2024/2640)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: CR (represented by: S. Orlandi, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

annul the decision of 4 May 2023 containing the notice fixing the applicant's pension rights;

order the European Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant puts forward one principal plea in law and a plea in the alternative.

Principally, the applicant alleges a failure to adhere to the scope of the provisions of the transitional regime contained in Articles 21, 22 and 28 of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union (‘the Staff Regulations’).

In the light of the case-law on the scope of Articles 21, 22 and 28 of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations and Article 1 of the Annex to the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Union intended to preserve the acquired rights and legitimate expectations of ‘staff employed’ at the time of the reform, Article 28 of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations can only be interpreted as being intended to govern the situation of a succession of periods of affiliation to the pension scheme, as a member of the temporary or contract staff and then as an official, where there was a break in those periods of affiliation. However, the applicant did not ‘resume active employment’ when she was appointed as an official, but simply continued the same activities while remaining affiliated to the same pension scheme, common to temporary and contract staff and to officials.

In the alternative, the applicant raises an objection of illegality in respect of Article 28 of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2640/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

* * *

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia