I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(2020/C 304/22)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Roxtec AB (Karlskrona, Sweden) (represented by: J. Olsson and J. Adamsson, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Wallmax Srl (Milan, Italy)
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court
Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark (Representation of black circles placed over an orange square) — European Union trade mark No 14 784 375
Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 20 April 2020 in Case R 2385/2018-2
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs incurred in these proceedings.
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(e)(ii) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.