- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-11/09: Judgment of the General Court of 23 February 2010 — Özdemir v OHIM — Aktieselskabet af 21 november 2001 (James Jones) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community word mark James Jones — Earlier Community word mark JACK & JONES — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62009TA0011
62009TA0011
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
17.4.2010
Official Journal of the European Union
C 100/39
(Case T-11/09) (<span class="super">1</span>)
(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community word mark James Jones - Earlier Community word mark JACK & JONES - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
2010/C 100/60
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Rahmi Özdemir (Dreieich, Germany) (represented by: I. Hoes, M. Heinrich, C. Schröder, K. von Werder and J. Wittenberg, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: P. Bullock, Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the Court: Aktieselskabet af 21. november 2001 (Brande, Denmark) (represented by: C. Barrett Christiansen, lawyer)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 3 November 2008 (Case R 858/2007-2), concerning opposition proceedings between Aktieselskabet af 21. november 2001 and Rahmi Özdemir.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Rahmi Özdemir to pay the costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 55, 7.3.2009.