- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-165/24: Action brought on 22 March 2024 – Trabelsi v Council
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024TN0165
62024TN0165
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
EN
C series
—
C/2024/4088
8.7.2024
(Case T-165/24)
(C/2024/4088)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Belhassen Ben Mohamed Ben Rhouma Trabelsi (Paris, France) (represented by: M. Ceccaldi and M. Hazguer, lawyers)
Defendant: Council of the European Union
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—declare admissible and well-founded the requests of Mr Belhassen Ben Mohamed Ben Rhouma Trabelsi in respect of the present application;
—annul, consequently, the annex to Council Decision 2011/72/CFSP of 31 January 2011 concerning restrictive measures to the extent they concern the applicant – file No 8 – in so far as that annex was extended, without reason, by Council Decision 2024/426 of 29 January 2024, and the effects thereof;
—order the Council to pay Mr Belhassen Ben Mohamed Ben Rhouma Trabelsi twenty thousand euros (EUR 20 000) to cover payment of his legal costs;
—order the Council to pay the costs of the proceedings.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.
1.First plea in law, alleging infringement of the rights of the defence.
2.Second plea in law, alleging a failure to fulfil the obligation to state reasons.
3.Third plea in law, based on the right to effective judicial protection.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4088/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—