Official Journal of the European Union

Series C

C/2024/630

15.1.2024

(Case C-653/23, TOODE)

(C/2024/630)

Language of the case: Latvian

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant at first instance and appellant on appeal: SIA TOODE

Defendant at first instance: Valsts ieņēmumu dienests

Questions referred

(1)Is Article 107(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to be interpreted as meaning that State aid is to be considered to have been ‘granted’ at the point in time when the competent public authority unduly refused to rule that an individual had a right to receive State aid, if such is established by a judicial decision made after the expiry of the time limit prescribed for granting the aid?

(2)Is Article 1(b)(ii) of Council Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 of 13 July 2015 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to be interpreted as meaning that aid which, in the absence of a decision by the competent public authority within the time limit prescribed for granting the aid, is granted to an individual after the expiry of the period laid down by the aid scheme for granting the aid, pursuant to a judicial decision finding that, within the period laid down by the aid scheme for the granting of the aid, the individual fulfilled all the conditions laid down by national law to receive the aid in question and that the refusal of the competent public authority to grant the aid was unlawful, constitutes existing aid?

Language of the case: Latvian

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/630/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

* * *

(1) OJ 2015 L 248, p. 9.