- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-358/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 27 June 2013 — Criminal proceedings against Markus D.
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62013CN0358
62013CN0358
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
9.11.2013
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 325/8
(Case C-358/13)
2013/C 325/13
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Party/parties to the main proceedings
Question referred
Is Article 1(2)(b) of Directive 2001/83/EC of 6 November 2001, as amended by Directive 2004/27/EC of 31 March 2004, to be interpreted as meaning that substances or combinations of substances within the meaning of that provision which merely modify — that is, do not restore or correct — human physiological functions are to be regarded as medicinal products only if they are of therapeutic benefit or at any rate bring about a modification of bodily functions along positive lines? Consequently, do substances or combinations of substances which are consumed solely for their — intoxication-inducing — psychoactive effects, and in the process also have an effect which at least poses a risk to health, fall under the definition of ‘medicinal product’ contained in the directive?
Directive 2001/83/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 November 2001 on the Community code relating to medicinal products for human use (OJ 2011 L 311, p. 67).
Directive 2004/27/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 amending Directive 2001/83/EC on the Community code relating to medicinal products for human use (OJ 2004 L 136, p. 34).