I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-414/05)(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community figurative mark LA KINGS - Earlier national figurative mark KING - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)
2009/C 153/64
Language of the case: English
Applicant: NHL Enterprises BV (Rijswijk, Netherlands) (represented initially by G. Llewelyn, Solicitor, and V. Barresi, lawyer, and subsequently by M. Collins, Solicitor)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. Novais Gonçalves and D. Botis, Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Glory & Pompea, SA (Mataró, Spain)
ACTION brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 6 July 2005 (Case R 371/2003-4), concerning opposition proceedings between Glory & Pompea, SA and NHL Enterprises BV.
The Court:
1.Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 6 July 2005 (Case R 371/2003-4);
2.Orders OHIM to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by NHL Enterprises BV.
* * *
(1) OJ C 36, 11.2.2006.