I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
C series
—
(Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures adopted in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine - Prohibition on investing in, participating in or otherwise contributing to projects co-financed by the applicant - Jurisdiction of the General Court - Action for annulment - Locus standi - Admissibility - Plea of illegality - Manifest error of assessment - Rights of the defence - Freedom to conduct a business - Proportionality)
(C/2024/3911)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Russian Direct Investment Fund (Moscow, Russia) (represented by: K. Scordis and A. Gavrielides, lawyers)
Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: A. Antoniadis and M. Bishop, acting as Agents)
Intervener in support of the defendant: European Commission (represented by: J.-F. Brakeland, C. Giolito and M. Carpus Carcea, acting as Agents)
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks, in essence, the annulment of (i) Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/346 of 1 March 2022 amending Decision 2014/512/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine (OJ 2022 L 63, p. 5) and (ii) Council Regulation (EU) 2022/345 of 1 March 2022 amending Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine (OJ 2022 L 63, p. 1), in so far as those acts concern the applicant.
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Russian Direct Investment Fund to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union;
3.Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs.
—
Language of the case: English.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3911/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—
* * *
*1 Language of the case: English.