EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-235/22: Judgment of the General Court of 15 May 2024 – Russian Direct Investment Fund v Council (Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine – Prohibition on investing in, participating in or otherwise contributing to projects co-financed by the applicant – Jurisdiction of the General Court – Action for annulment – Locus standi – Admissibility – Plea of illegality – Manifest error of assessment – Rights of the defence – Freedom to conduct a business – Proportionality)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022TA0235

62022TA0235

May 15, 2024
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C series

C/2024/3911

(Case T-235/22)

(Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures adopted in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine - Prohibition on investing in, participating in or otherwise contributing to projects co-financed by the applicant - Jurisdiction of the General Court - Action for annulment - Locus standi - Admissibility - Plea of illegality - Manifest error of assessment - Rights of the defence - Freedom to conduct a business - Proportionality)

(C/2024/3911)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Russian Direct Investment Fund (Moscow, Russia) (represented by: K. Scordis and A. Gavrielides, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: A. Antoniadis and M. Bishop, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: European Commission (represented by: J.-F. Brakeland, C. Giolito and M. Carpus Carcea, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks, in essence, the annulment of (i) Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/346 of 1 March 2022 amending Decision 2014/512/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine (OJ 2022 L 63, p. 5) and (ii) Council Regulation (EU) 2022/345 of 1 March 2022 amending Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine (OJ 2022 L 63, p. 1), in so far as those acts concern the applicant.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.Dismisses the action;

2.Orders Russian Direct Investment Fund to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union;

3.Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs.

Language of the case: English.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3911/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

* * *

*1 Language of the case: English.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia