- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-439/18: Action brought on 13 July 2018 — Sintokogio v EUIPO (ProAssist)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62018TN0439
62018TN0439
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
17.9.2018
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 328/53
(Case T-439/18)
(2018/C 328/72)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Sintokogio Ltd (Nagoya, Japan) (represented by: V. Dalichau, S. Kirschstein-Freund, B. Breitinger, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the word mark ProAssist — Application for registration No 1 327 746
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 3 May 2018 in Case R 2341/2017-2
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision concerning the EU Part of International Registration 1327746;
—alternatively amend the contested decision concerning the EU Part of International Registration 1327746;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs of the appeal proceedings and of the proceedings before the Court.
Pleas in law
—Infringement of Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of the Principle of equal treatment and sound administration, Article 107 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.