I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
((Action for annulment and for failure to act - Legal person informing OLAF of potentially reprehensible conduct - OLAF’s decision not to open an investigation - Measure not open to challenge - Inadmissibility - Costs - Equity - Article 135(1) of the Rules of Procedure))
(2019/C 44/82)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Stichting Against Child Trafficking (Nijmegen, Netherlands) (represented by: E. Agstner, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Baquero Cruz and C. Tritz, acting as Agents)
Request on the basis of Articles 263 and 265 TFEU seeking, first, annulment of the decision of the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) of 3 August 2017 not to open an administrative investigation in Case OC/2017/0451 and, second, an order requiring OLAF to open an administrative investigation and, depending on the findings of that investigation, to refer the case to the national law enforcement authorities for the purpose of criminal proceedings, and/or to the institutions of the European Union for the purpose of an administrative procedure.
1.The action is dismissed as inadmissible.
2.Stichting Against Child Trafficking shall pay the costs.
(*) Language of the case: English.
ECLI:EU:C:2019:140
* * *
(1) OJ C 402, 27.11.2017.