Official Journal of the European Union

EN

C series

—

C/2024/3443

10.6.2024

(Case C-157/24, GMG)

(C/2024/3443)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant in cassation: GMG Srl, in liquidation

Respondent in cassation: Ministero della Giustizia

Questions referred

Should Directive 2000/35/EC, (1) as amended by Directive 2011/7/EU, (2) and, in particular, Article 1, Article 2(1) and (2), and Article 4(3) of Directive 2011/7, be interpreted as precluding a piece of national legislation or a national practice that:

(a)excludes the classification of services, provided against remuneration by charterers of the equipment used for wiretapping at the request of public prosecutors’ offices, as commercial transactions within the meaning of Directive 2011/7, making them subject to the substantive and procedural regime covering extraordinary legal costs?

(b)consequently excludes the abovementioned services between charterers and public prosecutors’ offices from the rules governing interest which are laid down by that directive?

Should Directive 2000/35, as amended by Directive 2011/7, and, in particular, Article 10(1) of the latter directive, be interpreted as precluding a piece of national legislation or a national practice that lays down an indeterminate time limit (‘without delay’) for the settlement of fees due to a service provider, with the result that those creditor rights cannot be asserted in an effectively enforceable and fully satisfactory manner?

* Language of the case: Italian.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3443/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

—