EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-788/22: Action brought on 19 December 2022 — PT v Commission

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022TN0788

62022TN0788

December 19, 2022
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 63/60

(Case T-788/22)

(2023/C 63/77)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: PT (represented by: S. Orlandi, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:

Declare and adjudge that

the European Commission is ordered to refund to the applicant the updated capital representing her pension rights that she transferred to the Pension Scheme of the European Union Institutions under Article 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations;

the European Commission is ordered to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on a single plea in law.

The applicant relies on unjust enrichment, in so far as she transferred her pension rights into the Pension Scheme of the European Union Institutions (‘PSEUI’), which gave rise to a ‘crediting’ of additional pensionable years recognised in the PSEUI. However, that ‘crediting’ did not give rise to any increase in the amount of pension paid to her under the fourth paragraph of Article 77 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union (‘the Staff Regulations’), the calculation of which is based exclusively on years of service (to the exclusion of additional pensionable years to be credited in respect of the transfer of pension rights).

The refusal to repay the pension rights transferred having no effect where the mechanism of the minimum subsistence figure referred to in the fourth paragraph of Article 77 of the Staff Regulations applies, gives rise, according to the applicant, to the unjust enrichment of the European Union.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia