EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-353/22: Judgment of the General Court of 7 February 2024 — XH v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Promotion — 2021 promotion exercise — Decision not to promote the applicant to grade AD 7 — Article 45 of the Staff Regulations — Explicit decision rejecting the complaint — Modification of the application — Obligation to state reasons — Manifest error of assessment)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022TA0353

62022TA0353

February 7, 2024
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C series

C/2024/2296

(Case T-353/22) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)

(Civil service - Officials - Promotion - 2021 promotion exercise - Decision not to promote the applicant to grade AD 7 - Article 45 of the Staff Regulations - Explicit decision rejecting the complaint - Modification of the application - Obligation to state reasons - Manifest error of assessment)

(C/2024/2296)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: XH (represented by: K. Górny, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Hohenecker and L. Vernier, acting as Agents)

Re:

By her action based on Article 270 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the European Commission’s decision published in Administrative Notice No 31-2021 of 10 November 2021 not to include her name in the list of officials promoted as part of the 2021 promotion exercise and compensation for the damage which she allegedly suffered.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.Dismisses the action;

2.Orders XH to pay the costs.

(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 294, 1.8.2022.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2296/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia