- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-598/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Satversmes tiesa (Latvia) lodged on 13 November 2020 — AS Pilsētas zemes dienests v Latvijas Republikas Saeima
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020CN0598
62020CN0598
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 35/36
(Case C-598/20)
(2021/C 35/48)
Language of the case: Latvian
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: AS Pilsētas zemes dienests
Institution from which the contested measure emanated: Latvijas Republikas Saeima
Questions referred
1.Must the exemption from value added tax for the leasing of immovable property provided for in Article 135(1)(l) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (1) be interpreted as meaning that that exemption applies to the leasing of land in the case of compulsory leasing?
2.If the answer to the first question is in the affirmative — that is to say that the leasing of land in the case of compulsory leasing is exempt from value added tax — then, where all other instances of the leasing of land are subject to value added tax, is such an exemption not contrary to one of the principles of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax, namely the principle of neutrality of value added tax?
(1) OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1.