- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-669/22: Action brought on 3 November 2022 — IP v Commission
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022TN0669
62022TN0669
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
19.12.2022
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 482/29
(Case T-669/22)
(2022/C 482/39)
Language of the case: Portuguese
Parties
Applicant: IP (represented by: J. Martins, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the General Court should:
—declare the present action admissible and well founded;
—annul the contested decisions;
—order the defendant to pay the costs in their entirety;
—order the defendant to pay fair and adequate compensation.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action brought against the European Commission’s decision of 18 January 2022 to impose against IP the disciplinary sanction of termination without notice of his employment contract, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.
First plea in law, alleging infringement of the principle of sound administration and of the obligation to state reasons.
Second plea in law, alleging manifest errors of assessment.
Third plea in law, alleging infringement of Article 10 of Annex IX to the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union.