EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-377/20: Action brought on 18 June 2020 — KN v EESC

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020TN0377

62020TN0377

June 18, 2020
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

24.8.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 279/43

(Case T-377/20)

(2020/C 279/57)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: KN (represented by: M. Casado García-Hirschfeld and M. Aboudi, lawyers)

Defendant: European Economic and Social Committee

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

declare the present application admissible;

annul the contested decision of 9 June 2020, notified on 17 June 2020;

order the payment of compensation for non-material damage, amounting to the sum of EUR 200 000, and compensation for material damage, estimated in the amount of EUR 50 000;

order the defendant to pay all the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on four pleas in law.

1.First plea in law, alleging infringement of procedural rights and of the fundamental rights to good administration and to be heard as well as infringement of the principle of proportionality.

2.Second plea in law, alleging infringement of the principle of presumption of innocence and of the principle of impartiality.

3.Third plea in law, alleging infringement of the principle of legal certainty, in accordance with the maxim ‘nulla poena sine lege’, and of the principle of non-retroactivity.

4.Fourth plea in law, alleging infringement of the principle of confidentiality of disciplinary proceedings and judicial investigations as well as an apparent infringement of the guarantees provided under Regulation (EU) No 2018/1725 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2018 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data by the Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 and Decision No 1247/2002/EC (OJ 2018 L 295, p. 39).

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia