I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Community trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for Community word mark R.U.N. – Earlier Community and national word marks ‘ran’ – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) – Obligation to state reasons – Article 73 of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009) – Partial refusal of registration
Community trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services – Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark (Council Regulation No 40/94, Art. 8(1)(b)) (see paras 52, 71)
ACTION brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 22 October 2007 (Case R 1267/2006-4) concerning opposition proceedings between SAT.1 SatellitenFernsehen GmbH and Notartel SpA – Società informatica del Notariato.
Applicant for the Community trade mark:
Notartel SpA – Sociétà informatica del Notariato
Community trade mark sought:
Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:
Mark or sign cited in opposition:
Community and national word mark ran, for goods and services in Classes 9, 35, 38, 41 and 42
Decision of the Opposition Division:
Opposition dismissed
Decision of the Board of Appeal:
Appeal allowed in part, in respect of some services in Classes 38 and 42
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Notartel SpA – Società informatica del Notariato to pay the costs.