EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-462/08: Action brought on 13 October 2008 — Winzer Pharma v OHIM — Alcon (OFTAL CUSI)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62008TN0462

62008TN0462

January 1, 2008
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 327/38

(Case T-462/08)

(2008/C 327/67)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: Dr. Robert Winzer Pharma GmbH (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: S. Schneller, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Alcon, Inc. (Hünenberg, Switzerland)

Form of order sought

Annul the decision of the Board of Appeal of OHIM of 17 July 2008 (R 1471/2007-1) and the decision of the Opposition Division of OHIM of 16 July 2007 (B 809 899);

Reject the Community trade mark application No 003679181 ‘Oftal Cusi’;

Order OHIM to pay all the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: Alcon Cusì, S.A (subsequently, Alcon, Inc.)

Community trade mark applied for: the word mark ‘OFTAL CUSI’ for goods in Class 5.

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Winzer Pharma

Mark or sign cited in opposition: ‘Ophtal’ (No 489 948) for goods in Class 5.

Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejection of the opposition.

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal.

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/1994 (1) in that on account of their similarity there is a likelihood of confusion between the marks at issue.

(1) Council Regulation (EC) No 40/1994 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark (OJ 1994 L 11, p. 1).

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia