- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Cases T-910/16 and T 911/16: Judgment of the General Court of 4 April 2019 –Hesse and Wedl & Hofmann v EUIPO (TESTA ROSSA) (EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU figurative mark TESTA ROSSA — Partial revocation — Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Proof of use — Outward use of the contested mark — Equal treatment)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62016TA0910
62016TA0910
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
3.6.2019
Official Journal of the European Union
C 187/64
(Cases T-910/16 and T 911/16) (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>)
(EU trade mark - Revocation proceedings - EU figurative mark TESTA ROSSA - Partial revocation - Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Proof of use - Outward use of the contested mark - Equal treatment)
(2019/C 187/67)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant in Case T-910/16: Kurt Hesse (Nuremberg, Germany) (represented by: M. Krogmann, lawyer)
Applicant in Case T-911/16: Wedl & Hofmann GmbH (Mils, Austria) (represented by: T. Raubal, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (represented by M. Fischer, acting as Agent)
Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, interveners before the General Court, respectively in Case T-910/16 and Case T-911/16: Wedl & Hofmann GmbH and Kurt Hesse
Re:
Actions brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 5 October 2016 (Case R 68/2016-1), relating to revocation proceedings between Mr Hesse and Wedl & Hofmann.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Joins Cases T-910/16 and T-911/16 for the purposes of the judgment;
2.Dismisses the actions;
3.Orders Mr Kurt Hesse to pay the costs in Case T-910/16;
4.Orders Wedl & Hofmann GmbH to pay the costs in Case T-911/16.
(<span class="note">1</span>) OJ C 53, 20.2.2017.