- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-452/17: Order of the General Court of 28 June 2018 — TL v EDPS (Actions for annulment — Protection of personal data — Public nature of the case-law of the General Court — Request for anonymisation and removal from the Internet of a judgment of the General Court — Act not open to challenge — Confirmatory act — No new and substantial facts — Manifest inadmissibility)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62017TB0452
62017TB0452
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
27.8.2018
Official Journal of the European Union
C 301/33
(Case T-452/17) (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>)
((Actions for annulment - Protection of personal data - Public nature of the case-law of the General Court - Request for anonymisation and removal from the Internet of a judgment of the General Court - Act not open to challenge - Confirmatory act - No new and substantial facts - Manifest inadmissibility))
(2018/C 301/43)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: TL (represented by: T. Léonard and M. Cock, lawyers)
Defendant: European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS) (represented by: A. Buchta, M. Pérez Asinari, C. Gayrel and M. Guglielmetti, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application based on Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of the decision of the EDPS of 16 May 2017 rejecting the request seeking, in essence, (i) a new analysis of the question of its jurisdiction in relation to the dissemination on the Internet of the name of a party to proceedings by the Court of Justice of the European Union and (ii) an order that the judgment in [<span class="italic">confidential</span>] be anonymised.
Operative part of the order
1.The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.
2.TL and the European Data Protection Supervisor shall each bear their own costs.
(<span class="note"> <a id="ntr1-C_2018301EN.01003301-E0001" href="#ntc1-C_2018301EN.01003301-E0001">*1</a> </span>) OJ C 347, 16.10.2017.