- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Order of the President of the General Court of 25 October 2011. # DMA Die Marketing Agentur GmbH and Axel Hofmann v Republic of Austria. # Application for interim measures - No need to give a decision. # Case T-472/11 R.
ECLI:EU:T:2011:630
62011TO0472
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
INFORMATION ON UNPUBLISHED DECISIONS
(Case T-472/11 R)
(Application for interim measures — No need to adjudicate)
Applications for interim measures — Interim measures — Main action dismissed in the meantime — Request which has become devoid of purpose — No need to adjudicate (Art. 279 TFEU) (see paras 3-4)
Re:
APPPLICATION for suspension of forced execution of the judgment of the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austrian Supreme Court), of 15 September 2005, in case reference 4 Ob 145/05k.
Operative part
Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 26 October 2011 – Bayerische Asphaltmischwerke v OHIM – Koninklijke BAM Groep (bam)
(Case T-426/09)
(Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community figurative mark BAM — Earlier national figurative mark BAM — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — No similarity of the goods — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
II - 374*
INFORMATION ON UNPUBLISHED DECISIONS
Community trade mark — Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark — Relative grounds for refusal — Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services — Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 8(1)(b)) (see paras 61-62)
Re:
ACTION brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 11 August 2009 (Case R 1005/2008-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Bayerische Asphaltmischwerke GmbH & Co. KG für Straßenbaustoffe and Koninklijke BAM Groep NV.
Operative part
The Court:
Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 October 2011 — Intermark v OHIM — Natex International (NATY’S)
(Case T-72/10)
(Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark NATY’S — Earlier Community figurative mark Naty — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of goods — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Partial rejection of opposition)
II - 375*