- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-711/19: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 8 October 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof — Austria) — Admiral Sportwetten GmbH, Novomatic AG, AKO Gastronomiebetriebs GmbH v Magistrat der Stadt Wien (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive (EU) 2015/1535 — Article 1 — Procedure for the provision of information in the field of technical regulations and of rules on Information Society services — Definition of ‘technical regulation’ — Games of chance — Local duty on the operation of betting terminals — Tax rule — European Commission not notified — Enforceability against the taxpayer)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019CA0711
62019CA0711
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
30.11.2020
Official Journal of the European Union
C 414/16
(Case C-711/19)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Directive (EU) 2015/1535 - Article 1 - Procedure for the provision of information in the field of technical regulations and of rules on Information Society services - Definition of ‘technical regulation’ - Games of chance - Local duty on the operation of betting terminals - Tax rule - European Commission not notified - Enforceability against the taxpayer)
(2020/C 414/19)
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicants: Admiral Sportwetten GmbH, Novomatic AG, AKO Gastronomiebetriebs GmbH
Defendant: Magistrat der Stadt Wien
Operative part of the judgment
Article 1 of Directive (EU) 2015/1535 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 September 2015 laying down a procedure for the provision of information in the field of technical regulations and of rules on Information Society services must be interpreted as meaning that a national tax rule that provides for taxation of the operation of betting terminals does not constitute a ‘technical regulation’ within the meaning of that article.
(1) OJ C 406, 2.12.2019.