EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case F-88/15: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 15 December 2015 — Bonazzi v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Promotion exercise 2014 — General implementing provisions for Article 45 of the Staff Regulations — List of officials proposed for promotion by the Directorates-General and the services — Omission of the applicant’s name — Whether the list of officials proposed for promotion may be challenged before the Joint Promotion Committee — Failure to define a position by the Joint Promotion Committee — Consideration of comparative merits made by the appointing authority alone)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62015FA0088

62015FA0088

December 15, 2015
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C 48/97

(Case F-88/15) (<span class="super">1</span>)

((Civil service - Officials - Promotion exercise 2014 - General implementing provisions for Article 45 of the Staff Regulations - List of officials proposed for promotion by the Directorates-General and the services - Omission of the applicant’s name - Whether the list of officials proposed for promotion may be challenged before the Joint Promotion Committee - Failure to define a position by the Joint Promotion Committee - Consideration of comparative merits made by the appointing authority alone))

(2016/C 048/111)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Matteo Bonazzi (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: M. Velardo, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Beradis-Kayser and G. Berscheid, acting as Agents)

Re:

Annulment of the decision not to promote the applicant to the next grade (AD 12) in the European Commission’s promotion exercise 2014 and the claim for damages for the non-material damage allegedly suffered.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

1.Dismisses the action;

2.Declares that Mr Bonazzi shall bear his own costs and orders him to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.

(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 279, 24. 8.2015, p. 61.

* * *

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia