I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Appeal – Regulation (EC) No 2004/2003 – Regulation and funding of political parties at European level – Action for annulment – Objection of inadmissibility – Act open to challenge – Standing to bring proceedings – Inadmissibility – Appeal manifestly inadmissible
Appeal – Grounds – Mere repetition of the pleas and arguments put forward before the Court of First Instance – Failure to specify the error of law relied on – Inadmissible (Art. 225 EC; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.; Rules of Procedure of the Court, Art. 112(1)(c), first subpara.) (see paras 23-25)
APPEAL brought against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber) of 11 July 2005 in Case T-17/04 Front national and Others v Parliament and Council, by which it dismissed as inadmissible an action for the annulment of Regulation (EC) No 2004/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 on the regulations governing political parties at European level and the rules regarding their funding (OJ 2003 L 297, p. 1).
Dismisses the appeal;
Orders the appellants to pay the costs.