EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-230/12: Action brought on 23 May 2012 — Axa Belgium v Commission

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62012TN0230

62012TN0230

May 23, 2012
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

11.8.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 243/21

(Case T-230/12)

2012/C 243/38

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Axa Belgium (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: G. Cleenewerck de Crayencour, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

annul debit notes No 7141101047 in the amount of EUR 1 590,62 dated 23 March 2012 and No 7141101053 in the amount of EUR 10 160,88 dated 23 March 2012;

annul the payment by means of offsetting outstanding claims against debts which the Commission effected by letter of 26 March 2012 addressed to S.A. Axa Belgium (a letter bearing the reference D(2012) C4 — B.2 — 000212 and signed by Mr B. of DG Budget);

order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.

1.First plea in law, alleging infringement of the Treaties and an error of law, inasmuch as the Commission issued debit notes in respect of unfounded claims and effected recovery by offsetting claims that are not certain, of a fixed amount and due. The applicant submits that the Commission is demanding sums which exceed those granted under the legal rules currently in force in connection with the subrogation of the Commission to the rights of its officials who are the victims of accidents caused by persons who are insured in respect of statutory liability by the applicant.

2.Second plea in law, alleging infringement of the principles of sound administration and of the protection of legitimate expectations, inasmuch as the Commission offset notwithstanding a contractual undertaking not to do so and notwithstanding the fact that, for many years, the Commission has always agreed to settle cases by negotiation without having recourse to offsetting and waiting for decisions to be given by the Belgian courts.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia