- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Joined opinion of Mr Advocate General Mischo delivered on 13 December 1990. # Konishiroku Photo Industry Co. Ltd v Council of the European Communities. # Anti-dumping duties on plain paper photocopiers originating in Japan. # Case C-176/87. # Sanyo Electric Co. Ltd contre Conseil des Communautés européennes. # Droits antidumping sur les photocopieurs à papier ordinaire originaires du Japon. # Affaire C-177/87.
ECLI:EU:C:1990:467
61987CC0176
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Important legal notice
61987C0176
JOINED OPINIONS OF MR ADVOCATE GENERAL MISCHO DELIVERED ON 13 DECEMBER 1990. - KONISHIROKU PHOTO INDUSTRY CO LTD V COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. - CASE C-176/87. - SANYO ELECTRIC CO LTD V COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. - CASE C-177/87. - ANTI-DUMPING DUTY ON IMPORTS OF PLAIN PAPER PHOTOCOPIERS ORIGINATING IN JAPAN.
European Court reports 1992 Page I-01493
Opinion of the Advocate-General
++++
Mr President,
Members of the Court,
2. As regards the observations of the applicants in the present cases concerning "the Commission' s practices in calculating whether dumping was present" which, occupying one typewritten page, form part of the introduction to their applications, I, like the Council, consider that it is unnecessary to examine them. As each of the applicants states that,
"since other exporters will be raising these matters in separate applications, and in order to reduce the volume of pleadings to be examined by the Court, this application will concentrate on the questions of injury and Community interest" (page ii of each of the applications), it may be considered that those observations do not actually form part of their applications. Moreover, they are rather imprecise and could be easily refuted, first on the basis of the principle that the methods of calculating the normal value and the export price respectively are independent and, secondly, by virtue of the considerations set out in my Opinions in the other cases in relation to the submissions concerning the comparison of those two items.
(*) Original language: French.