EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-129/19: Order of the General Court of 25 March 2020 — Necci v Commission (Action for annulment — Civil service — Contract staff — Social security — JSIS — Rejection of the application for membership — Out of time — Substantial new fact — Inadmissibility)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019TB0129

62019TB0129

March 25, 2020
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C 175/24

(Case T-129/19) (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>)

(Action for annulment - Civil service - Contract staff - Social security - JSIS - Rejection of the application for membership - Out of time - Substantial new fact - Inadmissibility)

(2020/C 175/32)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Claudio Necci (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: S. Orlandi and T. Martin, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B. Mongin and T. Bohr, acting as Agents)

Interveners in support of the defendant: European Parliament (represented by: J. Van Pottelberge and I. Terwinghe, acting as Agents), Council of the European Union (represented by: R. Meyer and M. Alver, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 270 TFEU seeking annulment of the decision of the Commission of 18 April 2018 implicitly rejecting the application for membership of the sickness insurance scheme common to the institutions of the European Communities (JSIS), made by the applicant on 18 December 2017.

Operative part of the order

1.The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2.Claudio Necci shall bear his own costs and those incurred by the European Commission.

3.The European Parliament and the Council of the European Union shall bear their own costs.

(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 155, 6.5.2019.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia