I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case C-629/11 P) (<span class="super">1</span>)
(Appeal - Public contract awarded by the Commission - Rejection of the tender - Obligation to state the reasons on which the decision is based - Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 - Article 100(2) - Time-limit for replying to a request for information - Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2342/2002 - Article 149(2))
2012/C 366/27
Language of the case: English
Appellant: Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis (represented by: N. Korogiannakis, dikigoros)
Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: D. Calciu and S. Delaude, Agents, and P. Wytinck, advocaat)
Appeal against the judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 20 September 2011 in Case T-298/09 Evropaïki Dynamiki v Commission dismissing an application first, for annulment of the Commission decision of 12 May 2009 rejecting the tender submitted by the applicant in response to call for tenders EAC/01/2008 for external service provision for educational programmes (ESP-ISEP) (OJ 2008/S 158-212752) and of the decision to award the contract to another tenderer and, second, for damages — Article 93(1)(f) of the Financial Regulation — Period of validity of tenders — Non-contractual liability
The Court:
1.Dismisses the appeal;
2.Orders Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE to pay the costs.
Language of the case: English
* * *
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 49, 18.2.2012.