- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Order of the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber) of 14 January 1993. # Loic Lallemand-Zeller v Commission of the European Communities. # Legal aid. # Case T-92/92 AJ.
ECLI:EU:T:1993:3
61992TO0092
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Avis juridique important
61992B0092
European Court reports 1993 Page II-00031
Summary
The lodging of an application for legal aid without the assistance of a lawyer, within the time prescribed for bringing proceedings but prior to the initiation of proceedings, prevents time from running until the applicant is served with the order of the Court.
Parties
In Case T-92/92 AJ,
Loïc Lallemand-Zeller, residing at Sceaux (France),
applicant,
Commission of the European Communities,
defendant,
APPLICATION for legal aid pursuant to Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure,
OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES (Fifth Chamber),
composed of: D.P.M. Barrington, President, R. Schintgen and A. Kalogeropoulos, Judges,
Registrar: H. Jung,
having regard to Articles 94 and 95 of the Rules of Procedure,
makes the following
Grounds
By letter received at the Registry of the Court of First Instance on 13 November 1992, Loïc Lallemand-Zeller applied for legal aid in order to bring an action against the Commission of the European Communities following the decision of the Selection Board for Competition COM/A/721 not to admit him to the oral tests in view of the results obtained in the written tests.
Mr Lallemand-Zeller stated that he lacked means and lodged in support of his application a letter from the local social welfare department certifying that he has been without income since July 1992.
In its observations lodged at the Court Registry on 27 November 1992, the Commission stated that, in its opinion, the application for legal aid ought to be granted.
The applicant should be granted legal aid.
The applicant has taken no action in response to the request made by letter of 4 December 1992 that he should indicate a lawyer of his choice to act for him; Aloyse May, of the Luxembourg Bar, should therefore be appointed for this purpose.
In order to give due effect to the present application for legal aid, which has been lodged without the assistance of a lawyer, it should be noted that the lodging of that application, which appears to be justified, before the initiation of proceedings and within the period prescribed for that purpose, has prevented time from running for the purposes of bringing proceedings until the date on which the applicant is served with the present order granting him legal aid and appointing his lawyer.
Operative part
hereby orders:
Luxembourg, 14 January 1993.